From Parchment to Pixels: A Short History of Writing in Books

Explore the rich history of marginalia, from ancient scholarly notes and medieval artistry to Renaissance intellectual conversations and 19th-century personal reflection. Discover how this enduring practice of readers engaging with texts continues to evolve in the digital age.

Chloe Dubois

November 9, 2026 · 6 min read

When you write in the margin of a book, you join a practice that reaches back to the ancient librarians of Alexandria and forward into the highlighted passages of your e-reader. Marginalia—readers' notes, symbols, and drawings added to texts—has never been one activity. In the medieval era it served scholarship and decoration alike; during the Renaissance and the Printing Revolution it became a systematic tool of intellectual conversation; by the 19th century it had acquired its very name and a reputation for personal reflection. I want to walk you through that evolution, because what changed in each era was not just how people annotated, but what readers believed a book was for.

The Enduring Practice of Marginalia: A Historical Overview

One of the earliest forms of marginal commentary was the scholion—a written note placed in the margin, typically supplied by the scribe who produced the manuscript copy. Even earlier, three Greek Homeric scholars who successively served as librarians at the Library of Alexandria—Zenodotus of Ephesus, Aristophanes of Byzantium, and Aristarchus of Samothrace—developed a system of symbols for marking up Homer's poetry in the margins. That system, named after the obelus (the ancestor of the modern dagger †), became known as obelism. So annotation is, from its beginnings, a scholarly act: a way of flagging, questioning, and interpreting a text from the outside edge inward.

What makes marginalia so durable, though, is its variety. As Kiri Wagstaff observed in a 2012 paper on the evolution of marginalia, readers have added marginal commentary "for a variety of personal and public purposes," and historians have mined the annotations of important figures to observe their sometimes raw, immediate responses to texts. That dual character—the private scrawl and the public scholarly apparatus—is the thread that runs from medieval parchment to the digital page.

Medieval Manuscripts: Scholarly Notes and Playful Art

In the medieval manuscript, the margin was not dead space; it was working space. Des Cowley and Anna Welch, librarians of the History of the Book at the State Library Victoria, describe marginalia as a historic practice embedded in the manuscript tradition itself, where the border could hold commentary, correction, or artistry as part of the page's design.

A Bodleian Library manuscript (MS Douce 322) offers a vivid example of how scholarship and decoration blur. The page carries a large decorated initial S, adorned with spray vines that extend along the gutter and curve around the corners of the text—an ornamental style typical of its period in English manuscripts. But look closer at that initial: along the left side run curved flourishes resembling the letters nō stacked vertically. These closely resemble the standard abbreviation for nota—as in nota bene, "note well"—the scribe's signal to mark an important passage. A mark of scholarly attention was folded into the decoration itself.

Yet not every medieval margin image was so earnest. In recent decades, scholars have made many efforts to analyze marginalia in illuminated manuscripts, and multiple theories persist about its function and meaning in context. One study of medieval and Renaissance manuscripts depicting snails in the margins suggests the illustrations functioned as comic relief, playing on the similarity between knights' armor and snails' shells. Other studies indicate marginalia was used to provide additional commentary and support for the surrounding text. Humor, emphasis, and explication could share the same page—and literate audiences of the time would have recognized all of them.

Evolution of Marginalia: A Comparative Timeline

To see the shifts at a glance, compare the three key periods side by side. The table below categorizes surviving examples of marginalia by their intended function and form—and the pattern it reveals is a gradual migration of annotation from the institution to the individual.

Marginalia across three key periods in the Western book tradition
Period	Primary Purpose	Common Styles / Examples
Medieval era	Scholarly commentary, marking important passages, textual support, and artistic embellishment	Scholia by scribes; nota (nota bene) abbreviations woven into decoration, as in Bodleian MS Douce 322; comic and decorative images such as marginal snails
Renaissance / Printing Revolution	Systematic scholarly engagement; participation in wider intellectual conversation among scholars	Extensive notes, cross-references, and commentary on figures and ideas, as in Gabriel Harvey's annotated copy of Tusser's Five Hundred Pointes of Good Husbandie (1580); annotated copies prized as artifacts
19th century	Personal reflection and voluminous individual response to texts	The term "marginalia" enters English for Samuel Taylor Coleridge's notes, six volumes of which have been published as stand-alone texts

Marginalia across three key periods in the Western book tradition

Period

Primary Purpose

Common Styles / Examples

Medieval era

Scholarly commentary, marking important passages, textual support, and artistic embellishment

Scholia by scribes; nota (nota bene) abbreviations woven into decoration, as in Bodleian MS Douce 322; comic and decorative images such as marginal snails

Renaissance / Printing Revolution

Systematic scholarly engagement; participation in wider intellectual conversation among scholars

Extensive notes, cross-references, and commentary on figures and ideas, as in Gabriel Harvey's annotated copy of Tusser's Five Hundred Pointes of Good Husbandie (1580); annotated copies prized as artifacts

19th century

Personal reflection and voluminous individual response to texts

The term "marginalia" enters English for Samuel Taylor Coleridge's notes, six volumes of which have been published as stand-alone texts

Read down the first column and the function moves outward: from the scribe serving future readers, to the scholar conversing with peers, to the private reader thinking on the page. The 19th century supplied the label for what had always existed—the word "marginalia" did not enter the English vocabulary until that century, when it was used to describe the voluminous thoughts Coleridge scribbled into his books. His marginal notes proved substantial enough to be published in six stand-alone volumes, a fitting emblem of the era: annotation had become literature.

Marginalia in the Digital Age: Traces and Challenges

Where does the practice stand now? Wagstaff's 2012 argument was that with content migrating to electronic books, we should study reader annotation habits directly—she advocated a reader survey to obtain quantitative data so that tomorrow's digital reading devices provide relevant features and support. The open question she posed was whether the tools would actually match what readers do.

There is a philosophical shift, too. Scholars connected to the Archaeology of Reading argue that our understanding of knowledge depends on our engagement with media at any particular moment in history. One of them, William Egginton, observed that "we do a lot of our reading in what we call a virtual space nowadays, and we are leaving traces of ourselves there." Where a Renaissance reader left traces in a personal library, the digital reader leaves traces "out there with the texts themselves"—highlights and notes attached to platforms rather than to a shelf of owned volumes. The reader is no longer alone with the book; the annotation environment projects the text as never finished, open to continuous, collaborative marking.

Preservation is the harder half of the story. Wagstaff reports that librarians face the challenge of cataloguing books that arrive with pre-existing marginalia—some of which may increase a book's value or interest. In a 2010 survey of members of the Association of Research Libraries that Nicholson conducted, 91% of responding institutions had a process for indicating the presence of marginalia in a given book, but there was no field-wide consistent process for doing so. Jackson offered a further view of public libraries—that they understandably prohibit the writing of notes in their books—though Wagstaff flags it as plausible but unsupported by data. Physical marginalia, in short, survives haphazardly; digital marginalia raises its own questions of privacy and platform longevity.